Legal Opinion

Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1939No. Civ. 11164PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODELL, J., pro tem.

The petitioner, while working as a longshoreman for respondent Matson Terminals, Incorporated, suffered an injury to his right knee and applied for compensation, on which application, and at the hearing thereon, he was represented by an attorney whose name and address appeared on the record. The proceeding resulted in an award of $15.44 per week for temporary total disability and there was no application for rehearing or review. On January 21, 1939, almost fourteen months after the award, the respondent employer, a self-insurer, filed its petition requesting that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Caesar's Restaurant v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API