Legal Opinion

Jennrich v. Moeller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1931No. 28,309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Defendant Adolph W. C. Moeller appeals from an order denying his motion to open a default judgment and permit him to answer.

The summons and complaint were served upon defendant personally by plaintiff’s attorney, Mr. Kueffnér. There was no such delay in making the motion as to show laches or unreasonable delay. The proposed answer set out that the defendant had gone through bankruptcy and had been discharged from the indebtedness sued upon—a valid defense if established. The only excuse for not answering, set out in defendant’s affidavit, was that at the time the summons and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swanstrom v. MarvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Fitzgerald v. MaherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Peterson v. BengstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Flanigan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMahon v. Pequot Rural Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Nystrom v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API