Swanstrom v. Marvin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Duluth and from two orders refusing to vacate the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Collins, J.1
We are unable to discover any error in this case, which is an appeal from two distinct orders of the court, each refusing to vacate and set aside a judgment, and also from the judgment. The record shows that after a number of continuances the trial was fixed for July 9th, upon which day the defendant did not appear.. Thereupon judgment was ordered for plaintiff, (upon his testimony,) and such judgment duly entered by the clerk. The defendant’s attorney, in his affidavit of July 19th, on which was based an order to show cause why said judgment should not be vacated, claims that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Vermule v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Carlson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State Sash & Door Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Daggs v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Openshaw v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.