Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Maher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1915No. Nos. 19,345-(141)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Two actions in the district court for Dakota county by the administratrix of the estate of James H. Fitzgerald, deceased, one against the administratrix of the estate of Thomas Fitzgerald to recover $825, and the other against Annie Fitzgerald and others to cancel certain deeds.

Read the full summary

Two actions in the district court for Dakota county by the administratrix of the estate of James H. Fitzgerald, deceased, one against the administratrix of the estate of Thomas Fitzgerald to recover $825, and the other against Annie Fitzgerald and others to cancel certain deeds. At the trial before Johnson, J., it was stipulated in open court that judgment in each action might be entered in favor of defendant upon payment to plaintiff of $500. Plaintiff obtained an order requiring defendants to show cause why the stipulations, findings and judgments should not be set aside and vacated. From…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Plaintiff, in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, brought two separate actions in the district court *415of Dakota county, to recover what she claimed was due the deceased husband from the estate of his father, whose death preceded the death of j[ laintiff’s husband. The first action related to a money demand against the administratrix of the estate of the senior Fitzgerald, and by the second it was sought to have cancelled and set aside certain deeds covering the interest of her husband in lands belonging to the estate of his deceased father. Issue was joined in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Grigsby v. LilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Jennrich v. MoellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API