Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Bengston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1926No. 25,037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant H. A. Bengston appeals from an order of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis denying his motion to vacate a judgment against him and permit him to answer and defend.

The summons and complaint were served in December, 1923. The defendants failed to answer or appear in any manner. Judgment was entered in July, 1924. This application was made in May, 1925.

Appellant claims that he did not answer because he went to plaintiffs’ attorney and secured a promise to drop the action. The attorney asserts that he made no such promise, that the appellant talked with him about making a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. BackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  2. City of St. Paul v. MeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Jennrich v. MoellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API