Legal Opinion
Senior Citizens Coalition of Northeastern Minnesota v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 7, 1984No. C9-83-982, C9-83-1047PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
Two cases have been consolidated for disposition on this appeal. Both cases arose out of Minnesota Power & Light Company’s (MPL) 1981 application for a rate increase. Each case involves an appeal from a judgment entered in Ramsey County District Court, affirming a decision of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
In C9-83-1047, MPL appeals from that part of the PUC’s decision which excluded from the rate base MPL’s investment in recreational facilities which are being constructed at certain hydroelectric projects pursuant to licensing requirements of the Federal…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary InvestigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Waters-Haskins v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re the Request of Interstate Power Co. for Authority to Change Its Rates for Gas Service in MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.