Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1986No. Appeals, 493 C.D. 1985, 533 C.D. 1985 and 655 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr,

The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA), the City of Philadelphia (City) and eight suburban Philadelphia municipalities (municipalities) 1 separately appeal a Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) order granting Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) a base rate increase of $149,636,000. These appeals were consolidated for argument and disposition. We affirm the Commission order as to all three appeals.

On April 27, 1984, PECO filed Supplement No. 23 to Tariff Electric—Pa. P.U.C. No. 26, to become efiec tive January 27, 1985. This supplement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Green v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Zucker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. JerrytoneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API