People v. Woodward
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Wiest (Howard), J. Frank Woodward was convicted of violating the liquor law. From an order granting a motion in arrest of judgment, and discharging defendant, the people, under Act No. 159, Pub. Acts 1917, bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
An information was filed in the Ingham circuit court charging defendant with having had un*268lawful possession of a certain quantity of intoxicating liquor on the 30th day of May, 1920. It appeared upon the trial that defendant was arrested while in his own home, and that certain liquor was seized by the officers at the time of making the arrest. Subsequently a motion was made praying for an order quashing the information and for an order requiring the officers to return the liquor to defendant because of its having been seized illegally. When the arrest was made and the liquor seized the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. MargelisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. BlachuraMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. BrundageMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.