Legal Opinion

Ashbaugh v. Sinclair

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1942No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 41,721PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Ashbaugh is the receiver of the First National Bank at Pontiac, which acted as a guardian for the defendants during their minority and had control of their estates. During the progress of the guardianship, the estates of the three minors, although having a net value of $80,000 at one time, did not include sufficient cash for their maintenance. The principal asset of the estates was an apartment house in the city of Highland Park, which was subsequently lost through mortgage foreclosure. The bank advanced money to itself as guardian for the' maintenance of the several wards, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Chamberlain's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Capen v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Dickinson v. SeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ely v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Yedinak v. YedinakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Estate of MoukalledMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Estate Kus v. WetzelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hilliker v. DowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Noble v. McNerneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API