Legal Opinion

Yedinak v. Yedinak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1970No. Calendar 12, Docket 52,151PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

(for reversal). I cannot sign the opinions of my esteemed brothers Black and Adams written in this case. I agree with them that the Court of Appeals and circuit court need some reversing insofar as some provisions of the judgment of divorce relating to property settlement are concerned. I do not agree to remand for determination of rights of defendant’s brothers in property of plaintiff wife and defendant husband. I would affirm property settlement provisions of the judgment of divorce as entered by the circuit court, affirmed by the Court of Appeals and set forth in substance in Mr. Justice…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Ashbaugh v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Baugh ex rel. McGuire v. BaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bennett v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ypsilanti Charter Township v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In Re Estate of MoukalledMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ovaitt v. OvaittMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Souden v. SoudenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API