Legal Opinion

Roehl Storage Co. v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 37,725PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

James Y. Priest was the owner of two oriental rugs subsequently appraised at $1,666 which were taken on March 21, 1929, by the then sheriff of Wayne county under a writ of attachment, and left in plaintiff’s custody. Priest, who was never served in the attachment case, died May 2, 1929, and the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution on May 1, 1930. Defendant Moran was appointed special administrator of his estate May 23, 1933, and on June 12th, following, made a formal demand upon plaintiff for the return of the property, refusing, however, to pay plaintiff the sum it claimed for 51…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peck v. City National Bank of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Fletcher v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Fletcher v. MorrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kaufman v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Genesee County Savings Bank v. Ottawa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Hurd-Corrigan Moving & Storage Co, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Lawrence Warehouse Company v. Leo P. McKee Trustee of Seaboard Glass Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. San Angelo Wine & Spirits Corp. v. South End Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1936
  4. Nikolas v. PatrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Bayham v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API