Metcalf Live Stock Co. v. Short
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Worth superior court—Judge Eve. August 17, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Metcalf Live Stock Company sued on a promissory note. In addition to a general denial of indebtedness, the original plea of the defendant contained the following: “For further plea this defendant says that the consideration as is shown in the note was for a certain bay mare. The plaintiff fraudulently represented to the defendant that the said mare was perfectly sound and healthy, and said mare did appear to be, but defendant, after a few days trial, discovered that she was badly and incurably bellowsed, and as a result thereof was almost worthless. This defect was not discovered by ordinary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Newman v. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Barnett v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Stovall & Strickland v. McBrayerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Dunn v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Houze v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hendley v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Yeomans v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Mobley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Brunswick Pulp & Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1965