Legal Opinion

Metcalf Live Stock Co. v. Short

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1919No. 10156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from Worth superior court—Judge Eve. August 17, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Metcalf Live Stock Company sued on a promissory note. In addition to a general denial of indebtedness, the original plea of the defendant contained the following: “For further plea this defendant says that the consideration as is shown in the note was for a certain bay mare. The plaintiff fraudulently represented to the defendant that the said mare was perfectly sound and healthy, and said mare did appear to be, but defendant, after a few days trial, discovered that she was badly and incurably bellowsed, and as a result thereof was almost worthless. This defect was not discovered by ordinary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Newman v. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Barnett v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Stovall & Strickland v. McBrayerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Dunn v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Houze v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hendley v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Yeomans v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Mobley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Brunswick Pulp & Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API