Legal Opinion

Houze v. Blackwell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Attachment. Before Judge Patterson. Milton superior court. October 9, 1914.

1Per curiam

1. The petition, properly construed, shows the action to be one for deceit to recover an amount paid as the purchase-price of a horse in pursuance of a contract of purchase induced by actual fraud upon the part of the vendor.

2. To entitle the plaintiff to recover under the petition, it was necessary to show that the defendant knowingly made the alleged false representations as to the qualities of the horse, with intent to deceive the defendant, and that the defendant was deceived and suffered damage thereby. Dunn v. Beasley, 143 Ga. 376 (85 S. E. 100).

3. The charges complained of in the 16th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnett v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Dunn v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Stovall & Strickland v. McBrayerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Hendley v. ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Metcalf Live Stock Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API