Legal Opinion

Mobley v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 18, 1929No. 19539PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The statute relied on as authority for this action is section 46 of article 19 of the act of August 16, 1919, known as the banking act (Ga. L. 1919, p. 135 et seq.), which provides as follows: “All transfers of notes, bonds, bills of exchange, or other evidences of debt owing *459to any bank, or deposits to its credit; all'assignments, mortgages, conveyances'or liens; all judgments or decrees suffered or permitted against it; all deposits of money, bills or other valuable things for its use, or for the use of its stockholders or creditors; and all payments of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. McDonald v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. National Security Bank v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. McGregor v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Roberts v. HillUnited States Circuit Court · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API