Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 1948No. 5 Div. 251PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
The appeal in this proceeding is properly before this court; it affirmatively appearing the provisions of Section 369, Title 15, Code of Alabama, have been fully complied with.
The facts involved are without material conflict, and as appears from the transcript of the record and statement of the evidence are substantially as follows:
James E. Scott, the appellant (petitioner), was arrested under a governor’s warrant issued by the Governor of' the State of Alabama on a requisition of the Acting Governor of the State of Georgia, the said warrant, reciting that James E.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Montgomery Cotton Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- In re KuhnsNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- State of Tennessee v. HamiltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spivak v. HeinzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Aldio v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Shubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Delevie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.