Legal Opinion

United States v. Foust

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 19, 1983No. 45369; CM 441906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of possession and transfer of marihuana, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence extends to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 12 months, forfeiture of $493.00 pay per month for 12 months, and reduction to the grade of private (E-l). The Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence. 14 M.J. 830 (1982).

We granted the accused’s petition for review of the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. LeblancUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. LawUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. AgostoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API