Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
Decided May 26, 1994No. NMCM 93 0689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLISON, Senior Judge:
Appellant’s is another case presenting a post-trial claim that charges of child sexual abuse should have been disposed of by the court-martial convening authority in some manner other than the way they were. We *627find no error and affirm. We further hold: The policies set forth in the directives establishing the Family Advocacy Program on child abuse do not limit the prerogatives of a convening authority or the exercise of his discretion under the Uniform Code Military Justice; those policies do not create a personal right that may be advanced in bar of otherwise lawful…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Flores-GalarzaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. KohutNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2011
- United States v. BarryNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.