Legal Opinion

State v. Hirschkorn

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2002No. 20010094PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Lance E. Hirschkorn appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class B felony gross sexual imposition for engaging in sexual contact with a female under the age of 15 years. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the child’s hearsay statements about sexual abuse into evidence because the prosecutor failed to satisfy the foundational requirements for admitting the statements under N.D.R.Ev. 803(24). We further conclude admission of the evidence was obvious error affecting Hirschkorn’s substantial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. AabrekkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API