Legal Opinion
Brisard v. Compere
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 3, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendant Alan N. Layne appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated October 13, 1993, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the appellant’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him is granted, and the action against the remaining defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Callahan v. CallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Koncelik v. AbadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Manchester Equipment Co. v. Panasonic Industrial Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stone v. SchulzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- King David Associates v. SchonbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hong Qin Jiang v. Li Wan WuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020