Legal Opinion
Manchester Equipment Co. v. Panasonic Industrial Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (DiNoto, J.), entered November 5, 1987, which denied its motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, *617the motion is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed.
In September 1985, the plaintiff Manchester Equipment Company, Inc. (hereinafter MECI) and the defendant Panasonic Industrial Company (hereinafter PIC) entered into a contract which provided that MECI was to be a "non-exclusive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Marine Midland Bank-Southern v. ThurlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bango v. NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ark Bryant Park Corp. v. Bryant Park Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Feeley v. Whitman Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Oreman Sales, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991
- Brisard v. CompereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.