Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.) entered September 7, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants Joseph Friedman and 380 Yorktown Food Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Joseph Friedman and 380 Yorktown Food Corp. (hereinafter the respondents) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Stone v. SchulzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Brisard v. CompereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc. v. Biomed Pharms., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Harrington v. HasanCivil Court of the City of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API