Legal Opinion
In Re Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 22, 2010No. 1:09-cv-02084PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge.
This is a Multidistrict Litigation proceeding involving antitrust actions that are consolidated for pretrial proceedings. It is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Complaints [MDL Doc. 8, 9]; the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint [MDL Doc. 22, 23, 24, 26 and 28]; and the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Private Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaints [MDL Doc. 25, 27 and 29], For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants’ motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Federal Trade Commission v. Abbvie Products LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- In re Aggrenox Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Eiras v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverages & TobaccoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- In re Opana ER Antritrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.