Legal Opinion
In re Opana ER Antritrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 2016No. MDL Docket No. 2580; Case No. 14 C 10150PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*710MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge
This lawsuit is one of many in the federal courts involving the application of the Supreme Court’s decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc., - U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2223, 186 L.Ed.2d 343 (2013), to settlements between branded and generic pharmaceutical manufacturers. In this case, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) have brought claims under the. Sherman Act, and Indirect, or End-Payor Purchaser Plaintiffs (“EPPs”) have brought claims under state antitrust, consumer protection, and unjust enrichment laws. DPPs and EPPs (collectively, the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- City of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- GEICO Corp. v. Autoliv, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.