Castro v. Castro
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiff appeals from various post-judgment orders rendered by the trial court. The plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly (1) failed to find the defendant in contempt for her failure to allow the plaintiff access to an automobile stored at the marital residence, (2) denied the plaintiff’s motion to modify child support, (3) determined that the plaintiff failed to establish fraud, and (4) awarded counsel fees of $2500 to the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court with respect to the first three issues and reverse and remand with respect to the fourth issue.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jucker v. JuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Niles v. NilesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- McHugh v. McHughConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roberts v. RobertsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Dobozy v. DobozySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- McCarthy v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.