Legal Opinion

Jucker v. Jucker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 19, 1983No. 10625PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an appeal from the denial of the plaintiffs motion to open a judgment of dissolution in full or in part on the grounds of fraud. The court concluded that the plaintiff had not presented clear proof of the fraud and further that she had failed to use due diligence to discover and expose the alleged deception at the original trial. We find that there is an adequate factual basis for the conclusions reached by the court, that its conclusions of law were legally correct and we therefore find no error.

On January 28, 1977, the parties’ twelve year marriage was dissolved. At the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Varley v. VarleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Grayson v. GraysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Jackson v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency v. Landmark Investment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Masters v. MastersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API