Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1980No. 82-1101-HER518-6, CA 15014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

SCHWAB, C. J.

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioners have petitioned for judicial review of an Adult and Family Services Division final order that Aid to Dependent Children-Unemployment, (hereafter ADC-UN), assistance to petitioners be suspended for 60 days. 1 The ground for suspension was that petitioner Larry Ortiz on or about February 16,1979, "* * * refused to accept employment without good cause.” We review under ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.

Petitioner was an ADC-UN recipient when he was referred by the Employment Division to a tree planting job to begin on February 16, 1979. There is no question that petitioner was capable of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Oliver v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gooderham v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Praegitzer Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Sapp v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Insurance DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. McCann v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API