Ortiz v. Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
SCHWAB, C. J.
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Petitioners have petitioned for judicial review of an Adult and Family Services Division final order that Aid to Dependent Children-Unemployment, (hereafter ADC-UN), assistance to petitioners be suspended for 60 days. 1 The ground for suspension was that petitioner Larry Ortiz on or about February 16,1979, "* * * refused to accept employment without good cause.” We review under ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.
Petitioner was an ADC-UN recipient when he was referred by the Employment Division to a tree planting job to begin on February 16, 1979. There is no question that petitioner was capable of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Oliver v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Burke v. Children's Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gooderham v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Praegitzer Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Sapp v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Insurance DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- McCann v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.