Legal Opinion
Gooderham v. Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 3, 1983No. 4-2801-OZL798-1, 2-2801-OZJ759-3, 5-2801-MLI873-8 and 1-2801-MXO597-0 CA A22289PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.
Petitioners are four public aid recipients, who before September 1,1980, were receiving “special diet allowances” as part of their public assistance grants. Pursuant to former OAR 461-06-015, Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) provided supplemental assistance to help pay for a broad range of special diets for which there was verification of medical need. Petitioners appeal final orders of AFSD terminating or reducing their special diet allowances as of September 1, 1980. We reverse and remand.
In mid-1980 AFSD revised its “Special Diet Program.” An internal AFSD memorandum dated July…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Amfac, Inc. v. Garcia-MacielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Quattlebaum v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Quattlebaum v. KellyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.