Legal Opinion

Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 27, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 88-577PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

Sprang filed this appeal seeking review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Petersen Lumber, Inc. (Petersen Lumber). The trial court found that Petersen Lumber was the true owner of ten acres of property in Navajo County, free and clear of any claim of Sprang or any person or entity claiming under him. Because we find that Sprang is the only party who holds a valid interest in the property, we reverse and remand with instructions to enter partial summary judgment in favor of Sprang.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In December 1979,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Barlage v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Owens v. TergesonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Hanson v. WoolstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Pioneer Federal Savings Bank v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API