Legal Opinion
Drakos v. Jones
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 9, 1941No. 30280PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action to recover damages against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, on account of his prosecution in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county upon a criminal charge of having fraudulently obtained the sum of $25 from the defendant by executing and delivering to said defendant a bogus personal check.
The criminal action was commenced by the filing of an information subscribed and sworn to by the defendant, and its trial resulted in a' dismissal. In his petition filed herein plaintiff…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- State Life Ins. Co. of Ind. v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
- Ryan v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. First State Bank, WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Browning v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Patrick v. WigleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Price v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Miller v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.