Legal Opinion
Bonaparte v. American-First Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 29, 1929No. 19167PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The defendant in error, hereinafter called the bank, commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the county treasurer, to recover money paid for taxes levied against the shares of stock of the bank by the proper agencies of government in Oklahoma county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1927, said money having been paid by said bank under protest for the use and benefit of the shareholders as provided by the statutes.
It was agreed that the rate of taxation levied against said property was $44.11 per $1,000 of the assessed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- First National Bank of Hartford v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Minnesota v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Forry v. BrophySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Comanche County v. American Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- American National Bank of Tonkawa v. Andrews, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. State Bd. of Equal.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Holiby v. PoteetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Boise City Nat. Bank v. Ada CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.