Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1878No. 505PublishedCited by 85 opinions

' Appeal from the Court of Claims. This was an action against tbe United States to recover the amount which the commissioner of internal revenue had certified to the. comptroller of the treasury that the claimant was entitled to have refunded to him the value of returned special tax stamps, after deducting therefrom five per cent, as provided by law. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. There was a judgment against the United States, who there-' upon appealed. ■

1Opinion of the Court

'Mr. Chief• Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

Two questions are presented .in this case: —

1. Whether the Court of Claims has jurisdiction' of a suit,' brought to recover an amount allowed by the Commissioner of 'Internal Revenue, upon the claim of' a"brewer for an excess of ■ special tax stamps Used by him in payment of the special tax upon his business at. the beginning of the year, when, at the close, it was' found that he had manufactured léss than five hundred barrels, and the payment of the amount so allowed has been refused upon proper application at the treasury.

2.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Clyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Spradling v. Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1979

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API