Legal Opinion

Pakos v. Clark

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1969PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff brings this action against the Sheriff, of Multnomah County and five of the sheriff’s deputies claiming damage arising from certain acts that he alleges caused plaintiff mental suffering and anxiety. The specific acts charged against the defendants and forming the basis for this action are:

((# & *

“V
“That the defendants did on or about the 24th day of April, 1964, maliciously do the following acts to the plaintiff;
“(1) Made statements to plaintiff that he. was of unsound mind;
“ (2) Made gestures to plaintiff indicating plaintiff was of unsound mind;
“ (3) Threatened to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Savage v. BoiesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hovis v. City of BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API