Legal Opinion

Scott v. Pacific Coast Borax Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1956No. Civ. 21417PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The question in this ease is whether the circumstances of plaintiff’s injury bring compensation therefor under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Industrial Accident Commission. In granting defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, the trial court so held. We have concluded that decision is correct.

In 1951, plaintiff, then 16 years of age, began working for defendant on weekends, when needed, in its hotel and coffee shop at Death Valley Junction, in Inyo County. This hamlet is owned exclusively by defendant. It consists of a hotel, coffee shop, store, small first aid station, a gas station and garage,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Judson Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Page v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Van Horn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Maher v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API