Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. American Creosoting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1943No. 9516PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Conceding jurisdiction the respondent assails the findings of the National Labor Relations Board as being unsupported by substantial evidence and challenges the validity and appropriateness of its order requiring reinstatement of discharged employees and their compensation for lost wages.
The defendant is a corporation engaged in creosoting railroad ties for the C. & O. Railroad. During the period in which unfair labor practices were allegedly pursued, its employees ranged from 30 to 125, though for the greater part of the period employment was at high level. In December,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pool Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Tribune Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- In Re Continental Airlines Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.