Legal Opinion

Highler v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2006No. 02S03-0512-CR-616PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that the use of a peremptory challenge to strike a juror because of the juror's race, gender or religious affiliation violates the juror's right to equal protection of the laws. The juror's affiliation is to be distinguished from religious beliefs that prevent the juror from following the law. The juror's occupation, to the extent it may indicate a predisposition and is not a pretext, is a permissible ground for a peremptory strike.

Facts and Procedural History

Marshall A. Highler, an African American, was charged with rape as a Class B felony. "Juror 92" was the only…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RhoneWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Turner v. Roman Catholic DioceseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Addison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Boney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Gary Wayne Oswalt v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API