Legal Opinion

Gary Wayne Oswalt v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2014No. 35S02-1401-CR-10PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Chief Justice.

Under Indiana’s “exhaustion rule,” parties may seek appellate review of for-cause challenges to prospective jurors only if they have exhausted their peremptory challenges. But what if they use their last peremptory challenge for its traditional purpose of striking a candidate they consider undesirable, instead of using it to cure the trial court’s refusal to strike an allegedly incompetent one for cause? The State argues that doing so violates the exhaustion rule, thus waiving appellate review. We disagree and hold as a matter of first impression that parties satisfy the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kevin Charles Isom v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Jeffrey A. Weisheit v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. William Clyde Gibson III v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  5. Harold D. Wallick v. Eric B. Inman, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API