Legal Opinion

Iron Age Corp. v. Dvorak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2005PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an interlocutory appeal as of right from an order denying a preliminary injunction. We affirm.

¶ 2 In this equity action, Iron Age Corporation (Iron Age) seeks to enforce a confidentiality agreement against Joseph Gerard Dvorak, Jr. (Dvorak), a former employee, and appeals from the order of the trial court denying its request that a preliminary injunction be entered against Dvorak to enjoin him from working for a competitor because such employment is “likely to result” in the disclosure of Iron Age’s confidential information. The trial court made the following…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Warehime v. WarehimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Estate of WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. BotticellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Crum v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Lukes v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API