Legal Opinion

Olick v. Kearney

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 2006No. Civil Action 06-1531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATZ, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court are the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants James Kearney, Thomas Jenkins, and the Knights of Columbus, and Defendant Aetna’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs June 26, 2006 Amended Complaint (Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment), and the Plaintiffs response thereto. 1 For the reasons set forth below, both Motions are granted in part and denied in part.

II. Facts

In June 1995, Plaintiff Thomas Olick entered into an employment contract (“the Contract”) with Defendant Knights of Columbus (“Knights”) whereby Knights au thorized…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haisley v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API