Legal Opinion

People v. Zeigler

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2012No. H036573PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALSH, J.*

Mitchell Lewis Zeigler, defendant and respondent, petitioned for a certificate of rehabilitation regarding two prior drug convictions in 1989 and 2000. The People opposed the petition on the basis that it was barred by defendant’s new, nonviolent drug offense in 2007 for which he was granted probation under Proposition 36 (the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000).

Defendant argued that, because his 2007 conviction was set aside and the charges were dismissed after he successfully completed a Proposition 36 drug treatment program, the offense could not be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re VarnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. AnsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Palmer v. GTE California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ZamarripaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. ChildsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. In the Interest of D.S., S.S, R.H., J.S., and S.S., MinorsSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  5. People v. MarroquinCalifornia Superior Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API