Legal Opinion
Hoff v. Berg
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1999No. 980208PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jerome and Nicolette Hoff appeal a memorandum decision and an order dismissing their complaint for visitation with their grandchild. We conclude a 1993 amendment to the grandparent visitation statute, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-05.1, is unconstitutional. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
[¶ 2] In 1992, a child was born to Holly Berg and Nathan Hoff, who were not married. Hoffs recognize in their brief that Nathan Hoff was adjudicated the father of the child involved in this case, but has not been formally granted visitation rights. Holly Berg…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lulay v. LulayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.