Legal Opinion
United States v. Fernandez
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 27, 2001No. CR 99-83(A) DOCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL ORNELAS AND MICHAEL GONZALES
CARTER, District Judge.
Six weeks after the start of this third phase of the Mexican Mafia trials, the government sought to call two newly discovered witnesses, Michael Gonzales and Michael Ornelas, to testify about the disposal and retrieval of the guns used in the Montebello murders. Ornelas could testify that Arevalo had brought him two .380s and asked him to hide them, while Gonzales could testify that Arevalo had asked him to get rid of the guns. In addition, Gonzales could testify that Castillo…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Chadrick Evan FulksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Chadrick Evan FulksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. FulksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.