Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1989No. 87-177PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Peter Kole Murray, seeks review of the district court’s order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

On January 18, 1983, a jury found Murray guilty of the crime of attempted sexual assault felony murder. Murray appealed that conviction, and we affirmed in Murray v. State, 671 P.2d 320 (Wyo.1983). The facts of the case are set out in that opinion. On August 19,1986, Murray filed, pro se, a petition for post-conviction relief which raised three issues:

“[I] The petitioner was denied his rights under the Sixth Amendment to a fair and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Osborne v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. McInturff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API