Legal Opinion
Sax v. World Wide Press, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1987No. 85-4306PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Arnold J. Sax appeals the district court’s dismissal of his amended complaint in a diversity action. The district court concluded that Sax's claims for damages stated a derivative cause of action under Montana law and that he had failed to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1. The district court also dismissed Sax’s claim to liquidate World Wide Press, Inc. (World Wide), concluding that the claim could not be brought in the form of a direct shareholder action because Sax had not alleged acts that injured him personally but only acts that damaged World Wide. Sax contends that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Wallace Shah v. County of Los Angeles, Deputy Sheriff W. Corette, Deputy Sheriff MatsumotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Manson v. StacescuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re Sagent Technology, Inc., Derivative Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- In Re Verisign, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- May v. CoffeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Murray v. SevierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.