In Re Sagent Technology, Inc., Derivative Litig.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the consolidated shareholder derivative complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, and alternative motions to stay the action in favor of an action presently pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows.
INTRODUCTION
This is a shareholders’ derivative…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- McCabe v. FoleyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- In Re CNET Networks, Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bader v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Stephanie Keller v. Estate of Edward Stephen McRedmondTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.