Legal Opinion
Manson v. Stacescu
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 13, 1993No. 338, Docket 93-7417PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
David Manson and Mark Manson (the Mansons) appeal from a judgment entered in the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Egin-ton, District Judge, dismissing their action which sought relief under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (1988). The court held that the Mansons do not have standing to commence an action under RICO and denied the Mansons’ motion for leave to amend their complaint to allege additional facts relating to standing. On appeal, the Mansons contend that the court erred in holding that they do not have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Bivens Gardens Office Building, Inc. v. Barnett Banes of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co. Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.