Legal Opinion

Hodgin v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 1922No. 10,182PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

February 3, 1920, the defendants Palmer constituted H'odgin & Sharman their agents to sell a house in Canon City at the price of $4500 for a commission of $200. The agency created was not exclusive, and on the written contract, evidencing the agreement, was a statement that defendants had appointed another agent. Later defendants informed plaintiffs that a third agent had been appointed. Plaintiffs recognized, by their correspondence, that their agency was not exclusive, and expressed regret that defendants had placed the property for sale with other agents, and made a request that they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Gilmore v. BolioMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Chaffee v. WidmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Havens v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Grommet v. NewmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sherman Agency v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Mapes v. City Council of City of WalsenburgColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Houston v. H. G. Wolff & Son Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API