Legal Opinion
Grommet v. Newman
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2009No. S-08-0148, S-08-0149PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[T1] Blair Newman, dba Newman Realty (Newman), initiated this litigation by filing his complaint in the district court on June 19, 2006. Newman asserted that he was owed a real estate commission by Dean Grommet [Grommet], in accordance with the terms of a real estate listing agreement between them. 1 Newman also sought an award of attorney's fees from Grommet as provided for in the listing agreement, if he was successful in his action. It enhances the clarity of our opinion to note at this juncture that the real estate sale at issue here affected a large ranch property owned by…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Kacavas v. DiamondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barlow Ranch, Limited Partnership v. Greencore Pipeline Company LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of State Lands & Investments v. Mule Shoe Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Harold H. Dishman v. First Interstate BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Joe's Concrete & Lumber, Inc. v. Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.