Legal Opinion

Houston v. H. G. Wolff & Son Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1933No. 13,048PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as Houston and defendant in error as Wolff.

Wolff, a real estate broker, sued Houston for $750 commission on a trade, and had a verdict for approximately that sum on which judgment was entered. To review that judgment Houston prosecutes this writ. We have heretofore denied a supersedeas in this cause. On its final presentation no reply brief was filed.

The errors assigned are: (1) Certain evidence should have been excluded; (2) plaintiff’s motion for nonsuit should have been sustained; (3) demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained; (4)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geiger v. KiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Hall v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Hodgin v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Minks v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Morgan v. Howard Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Bonanza Real Estate, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. George v. DowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Great Falls Properties, Inc. v. Professional Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Cowgill v. NeetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API