Legal Opinion

Barney v. Gillespie

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 11, 1993No. 88-C-0007-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1539ORDER

SAM, District Judge.

The above entitled matter was referred to the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge made a report and recommendation (“R & R”) that defendant Mark Whittaker’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim be granted. Regarding the liability of defendant Jay S. Averett on the § 1983 claim, the magistrate judge found genuine issues of material fact in dispute and recommended Averett’s motion for summary judgment on' this claim be denied.

In addition, the R & R found that plaintiffs have no claim for relief against…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Wilderness Society v. Kane County, UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2006
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API