Legal Opinion
The Wilderness Society v. Kane County, Utah
District Court, D. Utah
Decided August 24, 2006No. 2:05-CV-854 TCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
In 2005, Kane County passed Ordinance No.2005-03 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance opened a large stretch of federal land located in Kane County (“the land”) to off-road vehicle (“ORV”) use. The land had previously been closed to ORV use by federal land managers. According to Kane County, it had the right to change the classification of the land and post open signs because it and the State of Utah have acquired rights-of-way on the land that have become part of the county road system, which is jointly owned and managed by Kane County and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilderness Society v. Kane County, UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2008